#1557

Yahya related to me from Malik that Ibn Shihab, Sulayman ibn Yasar, and Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman said, "The blood-money of manslaughter is twenty yearlings, twenty two-year-olds, twenty male two-year-olds, twenty four-year-olds, and twenty five-year-olds." Malik said, "The generally agreed on way with us is that there is no retaliation against children. Their intention is accidental. The hudud are not obliged for them if they have not yet reached puberty. If a child kills someone it is only accidentally. Had a child and an adult killed a free man accidentally, each of them pays half the full blood-money." Malik said, "A person who kills someone accidentally pays blood-money with his property and there is no retaliation against him. That money is like anything else from the dead man's property and his debt is paid with it and he is allowed to make a bequest from it. If he has a total property of which the blood-money is a third and then the blood-money is relinquished, that is permitted to him. If all the property he has is his blood-money, he is permitted to relinquish a third of it and to make that a bequest

وحدثني عن مالك، ان ابن شهاب، وسليمان بن يسار، وربيعة بن ابي عبد الرحمن، كانوا يقولون دية الخطا عشرون بنت مخاض وعشرون بنت لبون وعشرون ابن لبون ذكرا وعشرون حقة وعشرون جذعة . قال مالك الامر المجتمع عليه عندنا انه لا قود بين الصبيان وان عمدهم خطا ما لم تجب عليهم الحدود ويبلغوا الحلم وان قتل الصبي لا يكون الا خطا وذلك لو ان صبيا وكبيرا قتلا رجلا حرا خطا كان على عاقلة كل واحد منهما نصف الدية . قال مالك ومن قتل خطا فانما عقله مال لا قود فيه وانما هو كغيره من ماله يقضى به دينه ويجوز فيه وصيته فان كان له مال تكون الدية قدر ثلثه ثم عفي عن ديته فذلك جايز له وان لم يكن له مال غير ديته جاز له من ذلك الثلث اذا عفي عنه واوصى به